Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 DUTTON Team	12 Sloan Team	3NT E	KS	11		660		1	-1
2 Jones Team	15 SMITH Team	3NT E	KS	11		660		-1	1
3 SCHOKMAN Team	20 BURN Team	4 E	KS	10		620		1	-1
4 BEDDOW Team	9 HARDIE Team	3NT E	KS	10		630		1	-1
5 RHODES Team	11 Songerwala Team	3NT E	KS	10		630		1	-1
6 MORIN Team	19 Cowell Team	6 W	QC	11	100			12	-12
7 Daly Team	30 RAVN Team	4 W	6S	11		650		0	0
8 PACKER Team	13 SKLARZ Team	4 E	KS	11		650		-1	1
9 HARDIE Team	4 BEDDOW Team	4 W	QC	11		650		-1	1
10 WILSON Team	21 SPILSBURY Team	3NT E	KS	11		660		0	0
11 Songerwala Team	5 RHODES Team	4 W	QC	11		650		-1	1
12 Sloan Team	1 DUTTON Team	3NT E	KS	12		690		-1	1
13 SKLARZ Team	8 PACKER Team	4 E	6S	10		620		1	-1
14 HARMAN Team	17 Arendts Team	3 E	TC	8	100			12	-12
15 SMITH Team	2 Jones Team	4 E	TC	10		620		1	-1
16 Gammon Team	29 Dean Team	4 W	7C	9	100			13	-13
17 Arendts Team	14 HARMAN Team	3NT E	KS	9		600		-12	12
18 FIELD Team	26 PATEL Team	6 W	QC	11	100			13	-13
19 Cowell Team	6 MORIN Team	4 E	KS	10		620		-12	12
20 BURN Team	3 SCHOKMAN Team	4 E	KS	11		650		-1	1
21 SPILSBURY Team	10 WILSON Team	3NT E	KS	11		660		0	0
22 Tennyson Team	28 BROOME Team	3NT E	KS	10		630		0	0
23 Johnston Team	32 SHORT Team	3NT E	KS	10		630		0	0
24 BRAHMA Team	27 Lander Team	4 W	6S	10		620		0	0
25 HAVERCROFT Team	34 REID Team	3NT E	KS	9		600		2	-2
26 PATEL Team	18 FIELD Team	4 E	KS	11		650		-13	13
27 Lander Team	24 BRAHMA Team	3NT E	KS	10		630		0	0
28 BROOME Team	22 Tennyson Team	3NT W	7C	10		630		0	0
29 Dean Team	16 Gammon Team	3NT E	KS	11		660		-13	13
30 RAVN Team	7 Daly Team	4 E	KS	11		650		0	0
31 James Team	36 House Team	3NT E	5S	9		600		-10	10
32 SHORT Team	23 Johnston Team	4 W	6S	10		620		0	0
33 SINGH Team	35 HUGHES Team	4 W	6S	11		650		0	0
34 REID Team	25 HAVERCROFT Team	3NT E	KS	11		660		-2	2
35 HUGHES Team	33 SINGH Team	3NT E	KS	11		660		0	0
36 House Team	31 James Team	3 E	KS	10		170		10	-10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
6 by EW	-1	100	2
3 by EW	-1	100	1
4 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	+1	-170	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	3
4 by EW	=	-620	4
4 by EW	=	-620	2
3NT by EW	+1	-630	5
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	4
4 by EW	+1	-650	4
3NT by EW	+2	-660	7
3NT by EW	+3	-690	1

Alternative display format