Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
21 DEAN Team	26 YUSOF Team	2 W	3S	9		110		2	-2
2 WOOD Team	4 BIEGANSKI Team	3 W	2S	11		150		10	-10
26 YUSOF Team	21 DEAN Team	3 W	QH	12		170		-2	2
24 GOODMAN Team	7 WYLIE Team	3 W	3S	11		150		-1	1
10 SAKASHITA Team	23 JACOBSEN Team	3 W	QH	11		150		-6	6
7 WYLIE Team	24 GOODMAN Team	3 W	2D	10		130		1	-1
3 DALY Team	8 BROOME Team	3 W	3S	10		130		11	-11
17 STEED Team	15 HAMMOND Team	3NT E	QC	9		600		1	-1
1 DUTTON Team	19 BRAHMA Team	3NT E	QC	10		630		-1	1
25 DWYER Team	14 JENKINS Team	3NT E	QC	9		600		1	-1
4 BIEGANSKI Team	2 WOOD Team	3NT E	QC	10		630		-10	10
19 BRAHMA Team	1 DUTTON Team	3NT E	QC	9		600		1	-1
18 DANIEL Team	6 POWER Team	3NT E	QC	10		630		-1	1
16 TURNER Team	22 ROBERTS Team	3NT E	QC	10		630		-1	1
15 HAMMOND Team	17 STEED Team	3NT E	QC	10		630		-1	1
14 JENKINS Team	25 DWYER Team	3NT E	QC	10		630		-1	1
12 BURN Team	9 WILSON Team	3NT E	QC	10		630		-1	1
9 WILSON Team	12 BURN Team	3NT E	QC	9		600		1	-1
8 BROOME Team	3 DALY Team	3NT E	QC	11		660		-11	11
6 POWER Team	18 DANIEL Team	3NT W	3S	9		600		1	-1
13 COOKE Team	5 SYMONS Team	3NT W	3S	10		630		-1	1
20 LANDER Team	11 VALENTINE Team	3 N	QD	7		200		-7	7
11 VALENTINE Team	20 LANDER Team	4 E	JS	9	100			7	-7
23 JACOBSEN Team	10 SAKASHITA Team	4 E	QC	9	100			6	-6
22 ROBERTS Team	16 TURNER Team	5 W	2S	11		600		1	-1
5 SYMONS Team	13 COOKE Team	5 W	QH	11		600		1	-1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-1	100	2
2 by EW	+1	-110	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	2
3 by EW	+2	-150	3
3 by EW	+3	-170	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by EW	=	-600	2
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	4
3NT by EW	+1	-630	7
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1

Alternative display format