Boards Results

2020 MBC OAKWOOD CONGRESS SWISS TEAMS - MATCH 6

Board No: 20
Dealer: W, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -140

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 DUTTON Team 16 MATTHEWS Team 4 E 10 620 -12 12

2 PACKER Team 11 HENDERSON Team 4 E 9 100 6 -6

3 HOLMAN Team 21 TOFT Team 3NT W 8 100 13 -13

4 MUNRO Team 6 HAN Team 2NT W 8 120 0 0

5 BELONOGOFF Team 7 BROOKS Team 4 E 10 620 -12 12

6 HAN Team 4 MUNRO Team 2NT W 8 120 0 0

7 BROOKS Team 5 BELONOGOFF Team 4 E 9 100 12 -12

8 BIEGANSKI Team 20 YUSOF Team 4 E 9 100 12 -12

9 BROOME Team 19 DANIEL Team 3NT W 8 100 12 -12

10 ZOTTI Team 26 House Team 4 E 9 100 0 0

11 HENDERSON Team 2 PACKER Team 2 E 9 140 -6 6

12 MCNEILL Team 18 STEED Team 2 W 8 90 -7 7

13 HAVAS Team 23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team 3NT W 6 300 14 -14

14 VALENTINE Team 17 FRAMPTON Team 3NT E 9 600 -14 14

15 SONGERWALA Team 24 GOODMAN Team 3 W 8 100 12 -12

16 MATTHEWS Team 1 DUTTON Team 4 E 9 100 12 -12

17 FRAMPTON Team 14 VALENTINE Team 3NT W 5 400 14 -14

18 STEED Team 12 MCNEILL Team 5 E 9 200 7 -7

19 DANIEL Team 9 BROOME Team 4 E 10 620 -12 12

20 YUSOF Team 8 BIEGANSKI Team 3NT W 10 630 -12 12

21 TOFT Team 3 HOLMAN Team 4 E 11 650 -13 13

22 DEAN Team 25 MATSUMURA Team 3NT E 7 200 9 -9

23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team 13 HAVAS Team 4 E 10 620 -14 14

24 GOODMAN Team 15 SONGERWALA Team 4 E 10 620 -12 12

25 MATSUMURA Team 22 DEAN Team 2 E 10 170 -9 9

26 House Team 10 ZOTTI Team 3NT W 8 100 0 0

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by EW -4 400 1
3NT by EW -3 300 1
5 by EW -2 200 1
3NT by EW -2 200 1
4 by EW -1 100 5
3NT by EW -1 100 3
3 by EW -1 100 1
2 by EW = -90 1
2NT by EW = -120 2
2 by EW +1 -140 1
2 by EW +2 -170 1
3NT by EW = -600 1
4 by EW = -620 5
3NT by EW +1 -630 1
4 by EW +1 -650 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 DUTTON Team	16 MATTHEWS Team	4 E		10		620	-12	12
2 PACKER Team	11 HENDERSON Team	4 E		9	100		6	-6
3 HOLMAN Team	21 TOFT Team	3NT W		8	100		13	-13
4 MUNRO Team	6 HAN Team	2NT W		8		120	0	0
5 BELONOGOFF Team	7 BROOKS Team	4 E		10		620	-12	12
6 HAN Team	4 MUNRO Team	2NT W		8		120	0	0
7 BROOKS Team	5 BELONOGOFF Team	4 E		9	100		12	-12
8 BIEGANSKI Team	20 YUSOF Team	4 E		9	100		12	-12
9 BROOME Team	19 DANIEL Team	3NT W		8	100		12	-12
10 ZOTTI Team	26 House Team	4 E		9	100		0	0
11 HENDERSON Team	2 PACKER Team	2 E		9		140	-6	6
12 MCNEILL Team	18 STEED Team	2 W		8		90	-7	7
13 HAVAS Team	23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team	3NT W		6	300		14	-14
14 VALENTINE Team	17 FRAMPTON Team	3NT E		9		600	-14	14
15 SONGERWALA Team	24 GOODMAN Team	3 W		8	100		12	-12
16 MATTHEWS Team	1 DUTTON Team	4 E		9	100		12	-12
17 FRAMPTON Team	14 VALENTINE Team	3NT W		5	400		14	-14
18 STEED Team	12 MCNEILL Team	5 E		9	200		7	-7
19 DANIEL Team	9 BROOME Team	4 E		10		620	-12	12
20 YUSOF Team	8 BIEGANSKI Team	3NT W		10		630	-12	12
21 TOFT Team	3 HOLMAN Team	4 E		11		650	-13	13
22 DEAN Team	25 MATSUMURA Team	3NT E		7	200		9	-9
23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team	13 HAVAS Team	4 E		10		620	-14	14
24 GOODMAN Team	15 SONGERWALA Team	4 E		10		620	-12	12
25 MATSUMURA Team	22 DEAN Team	2 E		10		170	-9	9
26 House Team	10 ZOTTI Team	3NT W		8	100		0	0

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by EW	-4	400	1
3NT by EW	-3	300	1
5 by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
4 by EW	-1	100	5
3NT by EW	-1	100	3
3 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	=	-90	1
2NT by EW	=	-120	2
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
2 by EW	+2	-170	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
4 by EW	=	-620	5
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	1