Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 DUTTON Team	2 Jones Team	3NT S	6H	6		300		-10	10
2 Jones Team	1 DUTTON Team	3 S	KS	10	130			10	-10
3 SCHOKMAN Team	32 SHORT Team	4 S	AS	8		200		-7	7
4 BEDDOW Team	11 Songerwala Team	2 N	6S	7		100		-7	7
5 RHODES Team	12 Sloan Team	5 S	KS	9		200		-13	13
6 MORIN Team	22 Tennyson Team	3 N	JS	10	130			13	-13
7 Daly Team	20 BURN Team	4 N	JS	10	130			1	-1
8 PACKER Team	17 Arendts Team	5 S	AS	10		100		-12	12
9 HARDIE Team	18 FIELD Team	4 N	5S	8		200		-13	13
10 WILSON Team	26 PATEL Team	5 N	JS	11	600			7	-7
11 Songerwala Team	4 BEDDOW Team	3 E	9H	7	200			7	-7
12 Sloan Team	5 RHODES Team	5 S	AS	12	620			13	-13
13 SKLARZ Team	24 BRAHMA Team	3NT S	6D	8		100		-12	12
14 HARMAN Team	16 Gammon Team	2NT S	8S	7		100		-12	12
15 SMITH Team	23 Johnston Team	3 N	JS	9	110			7	-7
16 Gammon Team	14 HARMAN Team	5 S	AS	11	600			12	-12
17 Arendts Team	8 PACKER Team	3NT S	6D	9	600			12	-12
18 FIELD Team	9 HARDIE Team	3NT S	AS	9	600			13	-13
19 Cowell Team	25 HAVERCROFT Team	4 N	5H	12	170			10	-10
20 BURN Team	7 Daly Team	3 N	5C	9	110			-1	1
21 SPILSBURY Team	30 RAVN Team	3NT S	7S	8		100		3	-3
22 Tennyson Team	6 MORIN Team	2X W	AC	8		670		-13	13
23 Johnston Team	15 SMITH Team	5 N	JS	9		200		-7	7
24 BRAHMA Team	13 SKLARZ Team	5 N	TD	11	600			12	-12
25 HAVERCROFT Team	19 Cowell Team	4 N	JS	7		300		-10	10
26 PATEL Team	10 WILSON Team	3 E	QC	6	300			-7	7
27 Lander Team	31 James Team	3 W	AC	8	100			11	-11
28 BROOME Team	35 HUGHES Team	3NT S	KS	7		200		-3	3
29 Dean Team	36 House Team	5 S	AS	11	600			11	-11
30 RAVN Team	21 SPILSBURY Team	3NT S	8S	7		200		-3	3
31 James Team	27 Lander Team	3NT S	AS	5		400		-11	11
32 SHORT Team	3 SCHOKMAN Team	3 N	5S	9	110			7	-7
33 SINGH Team	34 REID Team	3NT S	7S	7		200		3	-3
34 REID Team	33 SINGH Team	4 N	9S	7		300		-3	3
35 HUGHES Team	28 BROOME Team	3 N	5S	8		100		3	-3
36 House Team	29 Dean Team	3 W	9D	8	100			-11	11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 23
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by NS	+1	620	1
5 by NS	=	600	1
3NT by NS	=	600	2
5 by NS	=	600	1
5 by NS	=	600	2
3 by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-2	200	1
4 by NS	+2	170	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
3 by NS	+1	130	1
3 by NS	+1	130	1
3 by NS	=	110	3
3 by EW	-1	100	2
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
2NT by NS	-1	-100	1
3NT by NS	-1	-100	2
5 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	3
4 by NS	-3	-300	2
3NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3NT by NS	-4	-400	1
2X by EW	=	-670	1

Alternative display format