Boards Results

2019 MBC WINTER CONGRESS TEAMS - MATCH 6

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -630

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

15 HAMMOND Team 20 LANDER Team 3NT W 5D 9 600 2 -2

14 JENKINS Team 11 VALENTINE Team 4 W 4H 11 650 1 -1

26 YUSOF Team 18 DANIEL Team 4 W AC 12 680 -1 1

25 DWYER Team 10 SAKASHITA Team 4 W AC 11 650 0 0

24 GOODMAN Team 23 JACOBSEN Team 4 W AC 12 680 0 0

23 JACOBSEN Team 24 GOODMAN Team 4 W KD 12 680 0 0

20 LANDER Team 15 HAMMOND Team 4 W AC 12 680 -2 2

19 BRAHMA Team 17 STEED Team 4 W JD 11 650 13 -13

18 DANIEL Team 26 YUSOF Team 4 W AC 11 650 1 -1

16 TURNER Team 13 COOKE Team 4 W AC 12 680 0 0

1 DUTTON Team 2 WOOD Team 4 W 3H 12 680 0 0

13 COOKE Team 16 TURNER Team 4 W 7H 12 680 0 0

11 VALENTINE Team 14 JENKINS Team 4 W AC 12 680 -1 1

10 SAKASHITA Team 25 DWYER Team 4 W 9H 11 650 0 0

8 BROOME Team 12 BURN Team 4 W 5D 11 650 13 -13

7 WYLIE Team 5 SYMONS Team 4 W AC 12 680 0 0

6 POWER Team 4 BIEGANSKI Team 4 W AC 12 680 -13 13

5 SYMONS Team 7 WYLIE Team 4 W AC 12 680 0 0

2 WOOD Team 1 DUTTON Team 4 W 3H 12 680 0 0

9 WILSON Team 3 DALY Team 6 E 7D 11 100 16 -16

3 DALY Team 9 WILSON Team 6 E 7D 12 1370 -16 16

21 DEAN Team 22 ROBERTS Team 6NT E 7D 10 200 3 -3

12 BURN Team 8 BROOME Team 6 W AC 12 1430 -13 13

17 STEED Team 19 BRAHMA Team 6 W 5D 12 1430 -13 13

22 ROBERTS Team 21 DEAN Team 6 W JD 11 100 -3 3

4 BIEGANSKI Team 6 POWER Team 6 W 2S 11 100 13 -13

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
6NT by EW -2 200 1
6 by EW -1 100 2
6 by EW -1 100 1
3NT by EW = -600 1
4 by EW +1 -650 6
4 by EW +2 -680 12
6 by EW = -1370 1
6 by EW = -1430 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
15 HAMMOND Team	20 LANDER Team	3NT W	5D	9		600	2	-2
14 JENKINS Team	11 VALENTINE Team	4 W	4H	11		650	1	-1
26 YUSOF Team	18 DANIEL Team	4 W	AC	12		680	-1	1
25 DWYER Team	10 SAKASHITA Team	4 W	AC	11		650	0	0
24 GOODMAN Team	23 JACOBSEN Team	4 W	AC	12		680	0	0
23 JACOBSEN Team	24 GOODMAN Team	4 W	KD	12		680	0	0
20 LANDER Team	15 HAMMOND Team	4 W	AC	12		680	-2	2
19 BRAHMA Team	17 STEED Team	4 W	JD	11		650	13	-13
18 DANIEL Team	26 YUSOF Team	4 W	AC	11		650	1	-1
16 TURNER Team	13 COOKE Team	4 W	AC	12		680	0	0
1 DUTTON Team	2 WOOD Team	4 W	3H	12		680	0	0
13 COOKE Team	16 TURNER Team	4 W	7H	12		680	0	0
11 VALENTINE Team	14 JENKINS Team	4 W	AC	12		680	-1	1
10 SAKASHITA Team	25 DWYER Team	4 W	9H	11		650	0	0
8 BROOME Team	12 BURN Team	4 W	5D	11		650	13	-13
7 WYLIE Team	5 SYMONS Team	4 W	AC	12		680	0	0
6 POWER Team	4 BIEGANSKI Team	4 W	AC	12		680	-13	13
5 SYMONS Team	7 WYLIE Team	4 W	AC	12		680	0	0
2 WOOD Team	1 DUTTON Team	4 W	3H	12		680	0	0
9 WILSON Team	3 DALY Team	6 E	7D	11	100		16	-16
3 DALY Team	9 WILSON Team	6 E	7D	12		1370	-16	16
21 DEAN Team	22 ROBERTS Team	6NT E	7D	10	200		3	-3
12 BURN Team	8 BROOME Team	6 W	AC	12		1430	-13	13
17 STEED Team	19 BRAHMA Team	6 W	5D	12		1430	-13	13
22 ROBERTS Team	21 DEAN Team	6 W	JD	11	100		-3	3
4 BIEGANSKI Team	6 POWER Team	6 W	2S	11	100		13	-13

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
6NT by EW	-2	200	1
6 by EW	-1	100	2
6 by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	6
4 by EW	+2	-680	12
6 by EW	=	-1370	1
6 by EW	=	-1430	2